This weekend, I decided to go visit Mission San Luis. The site is only a couple of miles from the FSU campus, but I somehow hadn’t made it there before. Since the official Mission San Luis website seems to be completely dead at the moment, I shall provide a very brief history of the site:
1633: Spanish Franciscan friars come to live among the Apalachee people.
1647: Non-Christian Apalachee revolt, killing Spaniards and burning churches.
1656: The friars and Apalachee attatched to Mission San Luis move to what is now Tallahassee. San Luis becomes the provincial capital.
1704: Fearing raids by the British, the inhabitants of Mission San Luis burn the structures and flee.
1983: The site of Mission San Luis is purchased by the State of Florida. Archaeological research and site reconstruction begin.
The Mission site seems to be very well managed. The visitor’s center and museum, while small, is very well done. In addition to displaying and interpreting artifacts, there are excellent diagrams, reconstructions, and interpretations of the archaeological work itself. One cool thing is a set of sliding glass panes that let you overlay various stages of excavation — and the associated data — on a plan view of the site. There are also recreations of two dig units in profile (as if you were standing in the pit, looking at the wall), that show important features as well as some artifacts in situ.
The site itself is also quite impressive. Complete reconstructions have been done of the church, friary, Apalachee community house (above), and a small Spanish dwelling. The buildings are furnished and appointed based on contemporary accounts and records of what was removed from the original buildings before they were burned. Excavation of the small Spanish fort has recently been completed, and apparently reconstruction of that is in the works. There must be some good money coming in from private donors to fund all this work. Admission to the site is free, and I can’t imagine that the state funds it this well. I’d wanted to ask about funding at the visitor’s center, but it was closed by the time I thought of asking. I wish more archaeological sites could get this kind of support.
I found something very interesting on one of the interior walls of the friary — the painted hand at right. Sadly, there was no accompanying explanation, and the visitor’s center was already closed when I discovered it. Each joint of the hand is assigned a number, and what appear to be solfege (do, re, mi, etc.) syllables. There are also little snippets of shape-note notation next to the hand. I’ve never encountered anything like this in my music studies. Can anyone (musicologists — hint, hint) tell me anything about this diagram?
Update: My dad identified this as a Guidonian hand, after Guido d’Arrezzo, an 11th century musician and teacher. I remember talking about Guido in music history, but have no recollection of this diagram. I’ll have to see if I can find an explanation somewhere. Also, I realized there’s no scale in the photograph — the hand is probably 4–5 feet tall.




3 Responses to Mission San Luis
Staci
Replied on: July 2, 2005, 6:30 pm
Yeah, Guido was a monk back in the day…like 1100s if I recall correctly. He’s very important to the history of musical notation, since he came up with the concept of the staff. He also came up with a system for teaching students how to sing using syllables — ut,re,mi,fa,sol. And there’s this whole thing about soft and hard hexichords. The hand goes along with his teaching methods. He used different parts of the hand to correspond to the different syllables.
Wow, guess I did actually learn something in that damn Medieval History class.
Staci
Replied on: July 2, 2005, 6:35 pm
Scratch that, I meant to say 1000s. I know, I know — Musicologists are supposed to have this stuff memorized.
Staci
Replied on: July 2, 2005, 8:10 pm
Oh yeah, I forgot to add that the different shapes on the noteheads are indications of metrical divisions. They are called breves, semi-breves, etc. Mensural notation didn’t exist in Guido’s time, but these can be translated into our modern time signatures.