I’ve spent much of today watching over an empty or nearly empty computer lab. It’s between summer school sessions, so there are hardly any FSU students around. The hordes of high schoolers here for summer music camp is a different story — but, they don’t get to use the lab.
As I’ve been sitting here, during my own shift and while covering those of two of my coworkers, I’ve done a variety of things to amuse myself: playing Text Twist, surfing the web, talking to Jennie, and reading. My current book, as some of you have probably noticed in my sidebar, is entitled “Columbus Was Last: From 200,000 B.C. to 1492, A Heretical History of Who Was First,” by Patrick Huyghe.
Warning: from this point on, I’m going to get nerdy
Huyghe starts out with the true discoverers of America: the peoples we now refer to as Native Americans. Funny how that works, huh? The book talks all about Beringia, the once extant land bridge between Siberia and Alaska that has long been assumed to be the point of entry for early humans traveling from Asia. It also examines evidence of entry by coastal sea travel. Huyghe then goes on to discuss archaeological evidence that challenges the old arrival date (ca. 11,500 years BP) of humans on this continent.
This is where he started to lose me. Some of the evidence he presents is fairly compelling (but still controversial), such as excavations at Monte Verde in Chile and the Meadowcroft rockshelter in Pennsylvania. These sites seem to push human arrival back a few thousand years from the previously accepted date. As I was reading about these, I started doing rudimentary online fact-checking. From what I was able to find (admittedly, not in anything so reliable as peer-reviewed journals), Huyghe is pretty much right on the mark. He tends, however, to emphasize the more fantastic and controversial dates and evidence — something I bet the archaeologists themselves would hesitate to do. But then, he starts talking about Calico Lake, a site in the Mojave Desert in California. This site has been (he admits, not completely reliably) dated to 200,000–300,000 years BP. However, the only artifacts the site has produced are pieces of rock that some argue are primitive stone tools, and others argue are just pieces of rock. It’s very obvious, however, that Mr. Huyghe wants to believe.
The next chapter discusses similarities between pottery in Ecuador and Japan approximately 5,000 years BP. Huyghe makes good arguments of morphological similarities and the feasibility (based on weather and currents) of a sea journey from Japan to Ecuador with the Japanese maritime technology of the period. But again, he gravitates towards the more fantastic explanations without offering much in the way of alternate theories. The next topic is supposed Chinese exploration — deliberate, methodic exploration — of North America about 4000 years BP. The evidence here seems quite weak and circumstantial. The interpretive stretches remind me very much of Gavin Menzies’s book 1421: The Year China Discovered America, which makes similarly dubious claims for a more recent Chinese landing in America.
It’s at this point in my internet fact-checking that I decide to get some facts on Mr. Huyghe. His bio on the book jacket is suitably vague, calling him only a “freelance science writer” and listing some of the publications for which he has written — no list of other publications. So, I went to Amazon. Now I understand why he seems so dearly to want to believe even the least well-supported theories. I present to you representative selections from the oeuvre of Patrick Huyghe, courtesy of Amazon:
•The Field Guide to Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents, and Other Mystery Denizens of the Deep
•The Field Guide To UFOs: A Classification Of Various Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Based On Eyewitness Accounts
•The Field Guide to Bigfoot, Yeti and Other Mystery Primates Worldwide
•The Field Guide to Ghost and Other Apparitions
•Swamp Gas Times: My Two Decades on the UFO Beat
That’s it. His credibility is gone. In my mind, he is now irrevocably assigned to the ranks of Erich von Daniken and Graham Hancock. These are the guys you see on the Discovery Channel espousing the notion that early civilizations (ie: ancient Egypt and various Mesoamerican cultures) couldn’t possibly have built their great temples and monuments without help from aliens or Atlanteans (who came from Mars, anyway). Every time I’m browsing the history section of a bookstore and I see one of their books, I’m overcome by a cold rage and the desire to create a separate “Crackpot” shelf for their benefit.
So, I’m going to finish the book, even if I scoff the whole way through it. I’ve never deliberately failed to finish a book. Besides, he can’t butcher Leif Ericsson and the Viking voyages to Newfoundland, can he? Can he?


One Response to Pseudoscience
Trevor
Replied on: June 23, 2005, 7:07 am
You know my link to your site reads…Dave Wells Knows All.…With posts like this you will never live that down. Fairmont!!!!
By the way I will be comeing home around the 13th of July will you be around?