Capturing Sound How Technology Has Changed Music (Roth Family Foundation Music in America Book)WorldCat • LibraryThing • Google Books • BookFinder
The many varied forms of sound recording and playback technologies, beginning with Edison’s invention of the phonograph in the 1870s, have undoubtedly changed the ways in which we listen to and disseminate music. Mark Katz argues that beyond this, recording has in many ways altered music itself: it has changed performers’ approach to playing music, composers’ approach to writing music, and has has even spawned completely new musical genres. In Capturing Sound, Katz provides a number of case studies, each exploring one of these “phonograph effecs,” as he calls them. His discussions encompass a variety of musics, ranging from classical and jazz to hip-hop and techno.
Katz begins by outlining what he sees as the seven most important characteristics of sound recording technology (e.g. tangibility, repeatability, and manipulability). It is these traits, singly and in combination, that give rise to the various phonograph effects Katz addresses in the remainder of the book. He then proceeds to give a short history of not of early recording technology, but of the various ways in which early recording and (especially) playback equipment found its way into American culture.
The first real phonograph effect Katz tackles is the dissemination and rapidly growing popularity of jazz in the 1910s and 1920s. Jazz was really the first genre to benefit during its formative years from the portability and repeatability of sound recordings. Katz provides a pretty good summary of this phenomenon, but I’m not sure he really adds anything to what previous writers have done. With his next topic, though, Katz enters what seems to be new ground.
Violinists, on the whole, increased their use of vibrato around the beginning of the twentieth century. This fact seems to be widely recognized, but little time has been devoted to determining the impetus for the change. Katz, as you might guess, makes a case for recording technology being responsible: violinists discovered that using more vibrato could compensate for some of the limitations of early acoustic recordings. The recordings they produced were then emulated by aspiring players, leading to a stylistic shift. This seems a good place to mention the CD that accompanies the book. It contains thirteen musical examples, of which five serve to illustrate the change in vibrato aesthetic. It’s quite helpful to have these; prose descriptions of sound are often insufficient.
Katz next discusses the relatively short-lived idea of Grammophonmusik — music in which the phonograph was used as a tool for composition. This might be done by altering existing recordings, or by actually attempting to engrave sound forms by hand onto a blank phonograph disc. The genre was mostly speculative, but a few examples created by Paul Hindemith survive.
The remaining chapters of Capturing Sound deal with popular music, and mainly with electronic and/or digital sound technologies. Katz gives a short history of DJing and turntablism, and then outlines his own fieldwork in the study of DJ battles or competitions. He devotes a chapter to the “art and politics” of sampling, looking at examples drawn from hip-hop, pop, rock, techno, and art music. Katz’s last chapter explores how MP3s (and other digital audio files) and peer-to-peer file-sharing networks are changing the experiences of listening to, discovering, and consuming music. While these various subjects have been treated elsewhere, they have generally not been done so with a scholarly approach.
Overall, I enjoyed Capturing Sound. Katz’s topics are interesting, and his writing style is clear and engaging. I found the book as a whole to be a little uneven, though. Some chapters (like those about violin vibrato and DJ battles) involve a great deal of Katz’s own original research, while others (such as those about Grammophonmusik and the rise of jazz) do not. Katz acknowledges that his various topics are “connected perhaps by nothing save recording.” Thus it is perhaps better to approach Capturing Sound as a collection of essays rather than as a cohesive book. I hope, as does Katz, that his writing will inspire others to produce work in a similar vein — I imagine there’s a lot more to be said about technology’s influence on music.

Dad
June 16, 2009 at 9:59 amAnother book that I need to read sometime! I suspect that some of what he puts forth has been recognized for a long time by record collectors, just not by musicologists. I’ve long argued that the invention of sound recording was one of the most important/influential developments ever in the world of music, mostly on the grounds of repeatability. One no longer had to be present during a performance to hear that performance [or some semblance of it anyway].
Blue Eyes
June 29, 2009 at 12:55 amvery nice post… thanks!