A Response From the Overture Center

A few days ago, I posted a let­ter about my frus­tra­tions with try­ing to buy Flight of the Con­chords Tick­ets. The fol­low­ing day, I received a response from the Over­ture Cen­ter Spokesman. It’s in a com­ment on the pre­vi­ous entry, but I thought I’d re-post it right on the front page:

Hello Dave — Rob Chap­pell, Over­ture Cen­ter spokesman here. You’re obvi­ously not the only one dis­ap­pointed by the way the FotC ticket sale went, so I’d like to try to shed some light on some of the con­cerns that you raise.

The sim­ple fact is that this show sold out very quickly, as pop­u­lar acts often do. We did have some web­site and phone sys­tem issues, how­ever, which we regret.

One rea­son the show sold out so quickly was that Flight of the Con­chords man­age­ment required us to make a pre­sale avail­able to FotC Fan Club mem­bers begin­ning on Mon­day, Feb­ru­ary 2, five days ahead of the gen­eral pub­lic on-sale. We were asked to make 70% of the avail­able tick­ets, or about 1,360 tick­ets, avail­able for this pre­sale. In addi­tion, we made a small pre-sale avail­able to our own email list and the pro­moter ran a pre­sale with one of the media part­ners, radio sta­tion WMMM. Only 250 tick­ets were allot­ted to each of those two pre-sales, which were made avail­able the day before the gen­eral pub­lic on-sale.

You also wanted to know how to get onto those pre­sale lists. The best way is to sign up for our e-list at http://paciolan.myprefs.com/?@overture&p2p=Signup. Join­ing fan clubs of bands or radio sta­tions you like can also help get you on pref­er­en­tial lists for pre-sales.

Any­way, when 11:00 Sat­ur­day morn­ing rolled around, we felt that we had to set aside enough tick­ets to accom­mo­date at least those who were stand­ing in line at 11. Our phone sys­tem was over­whelmed and crashed, a fact that we regret. In the end, only 371 were avail­able to sell through the Inter­net on Sat­ur­day, which didn’t take more than a few min­utes, as you can imagine.

Unfor­tu­nately, ticket resellers were able to pur­chase a num­ber of tick­ets and have sub­se­quently made them avail­able at much-inflated prices, as you note. We do have mea­sures in place to curb this as much as we can. For exam­ple, we’re hold­ing tick­ets in the first 15 rows at the box office and will only give them to the per­son who bought them (and only if that per­son has valid ID). Still, this reselling prac­tice per­vades the live per­for­mance and con­cert indus­try. It is dis­ap­point­ing to venue man­agers like us, to per­form­ers, and, most impor­tantly, to fans. Unfor­tu­nately, at this time, the mea­sures we have in place can only go so far to stop these out­fits from buy­ing tick­ets and reselling them.

We are truly sorry that you and many oth­ers were dis­ap­pointed not to get tickets.

Any­body with ques­tions can con­tact me at rchap­pell at over­ture­cen­ter dot com.

So, as I sus­pected, the pre-sales weren’t all the Over­ture Center’s doing — they had con­trac­tual oblig­a­tions to ful­fill. I still think that if pre-sales are going to eat up a major­ity of the seats for a given show, there should be some sort of gen­eral warn­ing to that effect along­side the notice of when tick­ets offi­cially go on sale. I have joined the e-mail list that Mr. Chap­pell men­tioned, and I sup­pose I’ll try to join fan club mail­ing lists for groups that I want to see in the future. Also, it seems that I would have scored tick­ets if I’d actu­ally gone to the Over­ture Cen­ter to stand in line. So, I guess I’ll do it the old fash­ioned way next time, rather than rely­ing on any tech­no­log­i­cal means to make my purchase.

Ticket Madness

I recently became aware that Flight of the Con­chords will be play­ing at Madison’s Over­ture Cen­ter in late April. I excit­edly took note of the date and time at which ticket sales would begin, as listed on the Center’s web site: Sat­ur­day, Feb­ru­ary 7 at 11 a.m. On the appointed morn­ing, I vis­ited the web site early, set up an account, and fever­ishly waited for 11 o’clock to roll around. As soon as my computer’s clock ticked to 11, I began the pur­chas­ing process. After I’d made all the rel­e­vant selec­tions, I received the some­what cryp­tic mes­sage “Unable to secure seats in this price level.” I made a few more unsuc­cess­ful attempts, and then decided to try call­ing the ticket office. The woman who answered (after I’d been on hold for quite awhile) cheer­fully told me that the show was already sold out. The time was 11:20am, and I expressed my dis­be­lief that every one of Over­ture Hall’s 2,251 seats had been sold in such a brief time. The ticket agent then told me that there had been two pre-sales, and that the tick­ets had all actu­ally sold before 11 — that is, before they offi­cially went on sale. I asked how one finds out about these pre-sales, and she replied sim­ply “I don’t know.”

I under­stand the pro­mo­tional value of mak­ing a small num­ber of tick­ets for an event avail­able to a select group of peo­ple. How­ever, allow­ing an event to sell out before the stated begin­ning of ticket sales is absurd and inex­cus­able. The Over­ture Center’s web site does not con­tain a sin­gle men­tion of (or warn­ing about) pre-sales. Fur­ther­more, at the time I attempted to make my pur­chase, there was no indi­ca­tion that the Flight of the Con­chords show was already sold out. Had this infor­ma­tion been avail­able, I might still be with­out tick­ets, but at least I wouldn’t have rearranged my Sat­ur­day plans around the sup­posed begin­ning of ticket sales or wasted half an hour fran­ti­cally try­ing to make a purchase.

I don’t pre­tend to know the intri­ca­cies of con­tracts between per­form­ers, pro­mot­ers, and venue, so I hes­i­tate to lay the blame for this sit­u­a­tion entirely at the feet of the Over­ture Center’s staff. How­ever, I do fault them for fail­ing to keep their cus­tomers informed. If pre-sales are out­side the Center’s con­trol, they can at least make the gen­eral pub­lic aware that pre-sales are occur­ring. They can also cer­tainly update their web site more quickly to reflect when a per­for­mance has been sold out.

My only option now seems to be pur­chas­ing tick­ets that mem­bers of the ‘select group’ of pre-sale par­tic­i­pants have made avail­able on Craigslist. But at a min­i­mum markup of 200%, they are now well out­side my grad­u­ate stu­dent budget.

I’ve sent a much-shortened ver­sion of this (on my own site, I don’t have to abide by any 200-word lim­its, ha!) to a num­ber of local news out­lets as a let­ter to the edi­tor. If any­thing comes of it, I’ll update this post.

Bump, Set, Yikes

I’ve been watch­ing alot of NBC’s cov­er­age of the Olympics (or the Games of the XXIX Olympiad, for you purists) this sum­mer. Hav­ing been an aquaphile my whole life and a com­pet­i­tive swim­mer through high school, I’ve nat­u­rally been most inter­ested in the aquatic events. There’s been plenty of excit­ing swim­ming in prime-time, along with gym­nas­tics and track. I’ve also seen some div­ing, row­ing, tram­po­line, field, cycling, and bas­ket­ball. But the sport I’ve prob­a­bly seen the most of is vol­ley­ball. Why? I have no idea.

Sure, it was excit­ing to watch Kerri Walsh and Misty May-Trainor squash their com­pe­ti­tion for their sec­ond gold medal in as many Olympic games. It was also impres­sive to see Todd Rogers and the gar­gan­tuan Phil Dal­hausser fight it out for the gold. And, it was funny to notice that the Brazil­ian women com­peted in sports bras that said “BRA 1″ and “BRA 2.” But, why is there so much beach vol­ley­ball (and seem­ingly just as much of its less excit­ing sib­ling: indoor vol­ley­ball) being broad­cast live? It’s been on pretty much every night I’ve watched, and some morn­ings, as well. Vol­ley­ball isn’t exactly a huge spec­ta­tor sport in the US. Why is it get­ting so much more cov­er­age than other lesser-known sports? What about sail­ing, white-water kayak­ing, or ping pong? Where are weightlift­ing, ten­nis, and archery? And most impor­tantly, why is vol­ley­ball on now instead of the Mod­ern Pen­tathlon, which NBC’s site tells me is also hap­pen­ing at the moment?

What,” you may be ask­ing your­self, “is the Mod­ern Pen­tathlon?” I asked myself the same ques­tion a short while ago while brows­ing the Olympics page on Wikipedia. It is, in short, the most bad-ass event at the Sum­mer Olympics, and it’s get­ting no TV cov­er­age. The Mod­ern Pen­tathlon is not a track and field event, as you might be inclined to guess. Instead, it com­bines skills from a range of dis­ci­plines: épée fenc­ing, pis­tol shoot­ing, a 200 meter swim, show jump­ing, and a 3 kilo­me­ter run. Yes: it involves run­ning, swim­ming, jump­ing over things on horse­back, shoot­ing at stuff, and fight­ing with swords. And instead of these impres­sive demon­stra­tions of modern-day-knightly skills, I’m watch­ing twelve men in short shorts hit a rub­ber ball back and forth. What the hell, NBC?

Yucatan Deep

Yucatan Deep Yucatan Deep Tom Mor­risey
Zon­der­van 2002
World­CatLibrary­ThingGoogle BooksBook­Finder 

Mike Bryant is a world-class cave diver and div­ing instruc­tor. After dis­cov­er­ing a pre­vi­ously unknown (to non-natives) cenote, or water-filled sink hole, in the jun­gles of Mex­ico, Mike and his men­tor Pete Wiley attempt a record-setting dive. Equip­ment fail­ures at 1,100 feet pre­vent Mike from reach­ing the bot­tom of the cenote. But, for unknown rea­sons, Pete never makes it back to the top. Mike returns to Florida and his work as a dive instruc­tor, but the cenote and his friend Pete are never far from his mind. Five years after the fate­ful dive, Mike receives a let­ter inform­ing him that his exclu­sive div­ing rights to the site will soon expire, and that Vik­tor Bel­lum — a com­pet­ing diver and all-around shady char­ac­ter — is prepar­ing to make an attempt. Against the wishes of Brid­get, his girl­friend and dive part­ner, Mike begins plan­ning and out­fit­ting another expe­di­tion to Mex­ico. As his team makes prepa­ra­tions at the Well of Sor­rows (K’uxulch’en, the Mayan name for this cenote), it becomes read­ily appar­ent that some­one — or some­thing — will do almost any­thing to keep Mike from reach­ing his goal.

The syn­op­sis I just gave is in the spirit of the one that appears on the book’s back cover. These two sum­maries each describe a fairly run-of-the-mill adven­ture book. The sug­gested cat­e­go­riza­tion pro­vided on the cover bears this out: “Fiction/General/Suspense.” How­ever, this is only partly truth­ful. In actu­al­ity, Yucu­tan Deep is an Evan­gel­i­cal Chris­t­ian adven­ture novel. There is very lit­tle on the book to tip a prospec­tive buyer off to this fact. One hint is to be found in Morrisey’s bio: “A pop­u­lar speaker, he is also active in both youth and prison min­istry.” The only other indi­ca­tion comes in the last sen­tence of the blurb: “Yucu­tan Deep is a taut tale of loy­alty, greed, and the well­springs of faith and life.” These two clues are present, but there is noth­ing that explic­itly reveals the book’s true nature.

So,” you may be won­der­ing, “what makes an Evan­gel­i­cal Chris­t­ian adven­ture novel dif­fer­ent from a reg­u­lar one?” The short answer: lots of Jesus. A more com­pre­hen­sive answer is that the cli­max of the plot com­prises not only the height of the action, but also the height of Mike Bryant’s exis­ten­tial cri­sis and the point of his becom­ing (under­wa­ter, of course) a Born-again Chris­t­ian. This con­ver­sion comes about after Mike makes an under­wa­ter escape that he attrib­utes to God, but that James Bond or Dirk Pitt would have ascribed to skill, luck, and the abil­ity to impro­vise under pres­sure. The char­ac­ter who is largely respon­si­ble for Mike’s con­ver­sion is a mis­sion­ary who works with iso­lated native peo­ples in Mex­ico (ugh… another rant for another time). This mis­sion­ary — named Elvis — is an ex-surfer who, were this book ever adapted for the big screen, would best be played by a youngish Keanu Reeves, circa Point Break. Elvis actu­ally says things like: “Dude, mir­a­cles are my boss’s spe­cialty!” Now, if Elvis’s surferisms were the most offen­sive aspect of Yucu­tan Deep, I could just write the book off as intended for a dif­fer­ent audi­ence. Unfor­tu­nately, this is not the case.

The book’s por­trayal of the indige­nous peo­ple to whom the cenote is sacred is often closed-minded and igno­rant. Mor­risey cre­ates a fic­tional tribe of Mayan descent who have had very lit­tle con­tact with the out­side world. He then makes this tribe evil, or at least mis­guided (in any case, ripe for “sav­ing”), by hav­ing them throw their sick and dying into the cenote, in a twist on Mayan sac­ri­fice. Of the Mayan belief that sacred cenotes are a sort of por­tal to rebirth in the after­life, Elvis says that it’s the same prin­ci­ple as a Chris­t­ian heaven, “it’s just a ter­ri­ble dis­tor­tion of it.” Later in the book it is revealed that this new form of sac­ri­fice (the sick and injured, rather than the healthy and will­ing) was insti­gated by the med­dling of a deceit­ful white man, anyway.

In another part of the book, the tribe’s leader agrees to a sim­ple test of the valid­ity of his reli­gion and the exis­tence of his gods. Should the test fail, he is fully pre­pared to con­vert to Chris­tian­ity and per­suade his peo­ple to do the same. I sup­pose this is the sort of thing career mis­sion­ar­ies fan­ta­size about: whole groups of peo­ple who are will­ing to give up cen­turies of rit­ual and tra­di­tion in the face of sim­ple chal­lenges of their beliefs. I hardly think that any Catholic would denounce his or her faith if his or her post-Communion stom­ach con­tents were shown not to include any human blood or flesh.

Tom Mor­risey also badly con­fuses the con­cepts of faith and con­fi­dence in empir­i­cal sci­en­tific data. The div­ing equip­ment that Mike plans to use for his sec­ond attempt at div­ing the cenote has under­gone rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure that it will prop­erly func­tion under the con­di­tions to which Mike will sub­ject it. The equip­ment has, of course, never been tested in the cenote at the tar­get depth — that wouldn’t be a test, that would be the real dive. But, Elvis inter­prets Mike’s will­ing­ness to use the gear as pow­er­ful faith; thus, he tells Mike that he pos­sesses the strength of faith nec­es­sary to become a Born-again Chris­t­ian. Mike sim­ply accepts this, appar­ently not real­iz­ing the mas­sive dif­fer­ence between the two.

Please, don’t read this book, or for that mat­ter any­thing else that Tom Mor­risey may have writ­ten. If you want an under­wa­ter and/or archae­o­log­i­cal adven­ture novel, go with some­thing by Clive Cus­sler or Dou­glas Pre­ston. And please remem­ber — espe­cially when shop­ping in thrift stores or used book shops, as I was when I pur­chased this — you can’t judge a book by its cover.
Read my ini­tial reac­tion to learn­ing the true nature of Yucu­tan Deep here.

Stupid, Not Stirred

A cou­ple of weeks ago, I was read­ing a food/kitchen gad­get blog, when I came across this prod­uct: the War­ing Pro WM007 Pro­fes­sional Elec­tric Mar­tini Maker. “Cool,” I thought, “it would be won­der­ful to turn a dial to ‘dry,’ press a but­ton, and sec­onds later receive a per­fectly mixed mar­tini.” Then, I actu­ally read the product’s descrip­tion on Ama­zon:

The ulti­mate in con­ve­nience and class, this commercial-quality mar­tini maker allows for effort­lessly prepar­ing a mar­tini at home. The unit’s pol­ished stainless-steel 20-ounce cock­tail shaker fea­tures a built-in strainer, while its touch­pad ensures easy oper­a­tion. Sim­ply add favorite mar­tini ingre­di­ents using the 1-ounce shaker cap, turn the appli­ance on and watch the green olive light up, press Shake or Stir, and voila–a time­less cock­tail is made. The cock­tail shaker and cap clean up eas­ily by hand, and the unit’s exte­rior can be wiped down with a soft cloth. Great for a quiet evening at home or ele­gant cock­tail par­ties, the 60-watt elec­tric mar­tini maker mea­sures 10−4÷5 by 7 by 15 inches and car­ries a five-year lim­ited motor warranty.

Wait… “Sim­ply add favorite mar­tini ingre­di­ents…?” The device doesn’t have chilled reser­voirs for the gin and ver­mouth? And you have to mix them your­self? And pro­vide your own ice? A lit­tle more online dig­ging shows that some sites claim that the machine “shakes or stirs a mar­tini until it reaches the opti­mal drink­ing tem­per­a­ture of 34° F,” while in the same breath say­ing that the “shaker moves up and down vig­or­ously dur­ing the shake cycle and gen­tly rotates in stir mode, meld­ing the ingre­di­ents dur­ing either cycle for 60 sec­onds.” Which is it? 34° or 60 sec­onds? It can’t always be both. Unless you’re work­ing with pre-chilled gin and ver­mouth, 60 sec­onds of either stir­ring or shak­ing would result in a great deal of ice melt­age, unnec­es­sar­ily water­ing down the drink.

Let’s recap. You pay $99.95 (plus tax/shipping) for the machine. You mea­sure the ingre­di­ents. You pour the ingre­di­ents. You add the ice. The machine wig­gles the shaker — either up and down (‘shaken’) or in a cir­cu­lar motion (‘stirred’) prob­a­bly for much longer than nec­es­sary. You pour the mar­tini. You wash the jig­ger and the shaker. You find a place to store the bulky uni­task­ing device. Wow, aren’t mod­ern con­ve­niences wonderful?

Just A Regular Guy

You may have seen some of Geico’s recent com­mer­cials, which each fea­ture a “real per­son” with a car-insurance-related story to tell, along with a celebrity to help them tell it. These com­mer­cials have fea­tured such celebri­ties as Lit­tle Richard, Peter Graves, Don LaFontaine (a voice-over artist with a very rec­og­niz­able voice), Burt Bacharach, and Verne Troyer. Some are fun­nier than oth­ers, but they’re a refresh­ing alter­na­tive to the played-out gecko spots. The newest one I’ve seen fea­tures Michael Winslow, known for his vocal sound effects in movies like Space­balls and the Police Acad­emy series. Here’s the video:

 

But wait… that “real Geico cus­tomer — not a paid celebrity” is Alex Klein, Pro­fes­sor of Oboe at Ober­lin Con­ser­va­tory, for­mer prin­ci­pal oboist of the Chicago Sym­phony Orches­tra, and Grammy win­ner (and direc­tor of the fes­ti­val I went to in Brazil last Jan­u­ary). He’s about as big a celebrity as one can be as a non-jazz wood­wind player. Not a celebrity? Humph. I attended his recital at the Inter­na­tional Dou­ble Reed Soci­ety con­fer­ence a cou­ple of years ago, and it was standing-room only in a large hall. The fact that he gets clas­si­fied as a “reg­u­lar per­son” while largely worth­less air­heads like Paris Hilton are “celebri­ties” is a sad com­men­tary on our society’s per­cep­tions of tal­ent, cul­ture, and the arts.

But wait… I think I see a sil­ver lin­ing here: I played in an dou­ble reed ensem­ble directed by Alex Klein, who was in a Geico com­mer­cial with Michael Winslow, who was in Space­balls with Bill Pull­man, who was in A League of Their Own with Tom Hanks, who was in Apollo 13 with — aha! — Kevin Bacon!

Ralph’s Secret Weapon

Ralph's Secret Weapon Ralph’s Secret Weapon Steven Kel­logg
Dial Books for Young Read­ers 1999
World­CatLibrary­ThingGoogle BooksBook­Finder 

I don’t nor­mally review children’s books here, nor do I often read them. But this book’s main char­ac­ter is unique (as far as I can tell) amongst char­ac­ters in children’s books: Ralph plays the bassoon.

I don’t recall exactly how I became aware of the exis­tence of this book. I think that it may have been via Google’s rel­a­tively new and won­der­ful Book Search. In any case, once I learned of its exis­tence, I set about try­ing to obtain a copy. Ralph’s Secret Weapon is out of print, but the UW Coop­er­a­tive Children’s Book Cen­ter owns a copy. A few clicks of the mouse later, I’d arranged for the book to be sent to UW’s Memo­r­ial Library, where I could eas­ily retrieve it.

When the e-mail mes­sage arrived announc­ing that Kellogg’s book was wait­ing for me, I set out for the cir­cu­la­tion desk with an air of antic­i­pa­tion. I retrieved the diminu­tive yet col­or­ful vol­ume and eagerly set about read­ing it. I was over­joyed to find that Ralph’s bas­soon play­ing is not merely a glossed-over detail; it is a main com­po­nent of the plot. Kellogg’s car­toony bas­soon appears in ten out of the twenty-seven illus­tra­tions (plus the cover), with Ralph car­ry­ing the instru­ment in its case in three more. But, as I reached the last page, my utter delight turned to a bit­ter dis­ap­point­ment, and then to a dis­be­liev­ing anger.

Why the sud­den change?” you might ask. Allow me to pro­vide a sum­mary of the plot:
Ralph is sent off to his aunt’s house for the sum­mer. His aunt greet him with a cake and a bas­soon. That after­noon, Ralph has his first bas­soon les­son. The teacher tells him that he’s not cut out for the bas­soon, but Ralph’s aunt sees great pos­si­bil­i­ties for him as a snake charmer. She takes Ralph to a snake charm­ing com­pe­ti­tion (coin­ci­den­tally being held in town that very night), which he eas­ily wins. Ralph’s Aunt sees greater pos­si­bil­i­ties for him, and calls up the navy, which is being ter­ror­ized by a sea ser­pent. Ralph goes to sea aboard a destroyer, and starts play­ing his bas­soon. Sure enough, the sea ser­pent is drawn to the sound. But, he eats the bas­soon and grabs Ralph. Luck­ily, Ralph has brought along a secret weapon (which turns out to be his aunt’s cake) that causes the ser­pent to regur­gi­tate Ralph, his bas­soon, and a bunch of other peo­ple who’d been recently swal­lowed. Ralph and his aunt return home, where Ralph announces that he’s giv­ing up the bas­soon for­ever. His aunt doesn’t object, and Ralph spends the rest of the sum­mer goof­ing off.

Wait.

What?

GIVING UP THE BASSOON FOREVER?

What kind of mes­sage is this send­ing to chil­dren? That music isn’t fun and if you aren’t instantly good at it, you should quit and spend your time actu­ally hav­ing fun instead? My first read­ing of the book was an extremely fast one, so I took the time to read and look at the illus­tra­tions more closely. This only deep­ened my dis­sat­is­fac­tion.
In the illus­tra­tion in which Ralph’s aunt sets him up in her music room, the book she places on the music stand is titled “Dreary Drills and Tedious Exer­cises for the Bas­soon” (Music is bor­ing!). In Ralph’s first — and only — les­son with Mae­stro Pre­pos­teroso (Musi­cians are ridicu­lous!), the teacher tells Ralph that he has “no tal­ent what­so­ever” (Either you’re an instant vir­tu­oso or a no-talent hack! Prac­tice is worth­less!). In the end, Ralph gives up the bas­soon for­ever, with no objec­tions or pos­i­tive rein­force­ment from his aunt (If at first you don’t suc­ceed, quit and go play with your dog!).

It’s very dis­ap­point­ing that the lone children’s book fea­tur­ing the bas­soon con­tains such neg­a­tive mes­sages about the instru­ment specif­i­cally and music in gen­eral. Shame on you, Mr. Kel­logg. I’m glad that Ralph’s Secret Weapon is out of print — this lim­its the num­ber of young minds it can warp.

How to Get a Practice Room

Steps in gain­ing access to a prac­tice room at most music schools:

  1. Find empty prac­tice room.
  2. Prac­tice.

Steps in gain­ing access to a prac­tice room at UW-Madison:

  1. Click through mul­ti­ple lev­els of the UW School of Music web­site to find the online prac­tice room application.
  2. Login with your UW NetID.
  3. Deter­mine which ‘color’ of prac­tice room access is right for you.
  4. Com­plete online application.
  5. Go to cashier’s win­dow in stu­dent union to add money to your Wis­card account, because the School of Music does not accept credit/debit cards or cash.
  6. Go back to cashier’s win­dow, because you real­ize that you only added enough money for a one-semester fee, but you spec­i­fied a two-semester term on the online application.
  7. Go to music office to pay, find out that your request hasn’t yet been approved.
  8. Find facil­i­ties man­ager, get him to approve request.
  9. Go back to music office, shell out $95 for the priv­i­lege of prac­tic­ing in tiny rooms for the fall and spring semesters.
  10. Go to key desk.
  11. Pro­vided that the rooms aren’t all full, trade stu­dent ID for prac­tice room key.
  12. Prac­tice.

Granted, I could have avoided a cou­ple of those steps if I’d been a lit­tle more on top of things. But, that’s still a hell of a lot to go through just to be able to practice.

A Haiku:

One hour on hold
With Cin­gu­lar Wire­less.
No live human yet.

Wasted

After work­ing for a cou­ple of hours this morn­ing in the Col­lege of Music com­puter lab, I changed into my Jack­son Pol­lock designer jeans with match­ing hat and shoes and headed across town for an after­noon of paint­ing. Upon arriv­ing at the com­plex, I gath­ered up my sup­plies from the apart­ment we worked on last night, and moved every­thing to my next assigned unit. When I opened the door, I was taken aback by the amount of trash all over the liv­ing room floor. A quick inspec­tion of the rest of the apart­ment revealed a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion in every room.

As I began mov­ing every­thing to the cen­ters of rooms (to facil­i­tate paint­ing the walls), I began to notice that only some of what had been left was trash. There was a sur­pris­ing quan­tity of items that were usable shape. Fur­ther work revealed that there were even a num­ber of almost new items and some that, in fact, had never been opened.

Viz:

(1) unused Black and Decker iron
(1) unopened 6-pin to 4-pin USB cable with receipt
(2) unopened pad­locks
(1) unopened 25′ tape mea­sure
(2) used but good con­di­tion ham­mers
(1) unopened read­ing light
(1) per­fectly ser­vice­able desk
(1) large tea ket­tle
(1) reusable res­cue breathing/CPR face mask
(6) per­fectly good 3-ring binders
(1) flask
an assort­ment of dishes, pots, pans, and uten­sils
a num­ber of par­tially used con­tain­ers of laun­dry deter­gent
var­i­ous clean­ing products

This stuff was all mixed in with trash, stacks of body­build­ing mag­a­zines, and what looked to be the entire con­tents of one of the bath­rooms — includ­ing elec­tric tooth­brush. It’s obvi­ous that these peo­ple left in a hurry and didn’t bother to take a bunch of things with them. From the stuff that they left behind, it also seems prob­a­ble that daddy buys them what­ever they want, and they have no qualms about dis­card­ing per­fectly good items. They also don’t have the decency to throw away their trash or find good homes for things they don’t want. This is why the world hates America.

What really infu­ri­ates me though, is that every­thing, from waste paper to the unused iron, will get thrown in the trash. We’re not allowed to take any of it. Most of it, I don’t even want — I just want to take it to Good­will or give it to friends or do any­thing use­ful with it so that it won’t merely take up space in a land­fill. But no, due to the ridicu­lously liti­gious nature of our soci­ety, any­thing left by the ten­ants must sim­ply get dumped in the trash. No recy­cling, no reusing, no pass­ing on items to needy indi­vid­u­als — nothing.

The aban­doned items that puz­zled me the most were found in the fridge. The occu­pants left six unopened bot­tles of beer and half a bot­tle of white wine in the fridge, and a flask of some­thing chill­ing in the freezer. What col­lege stu­dent leaves alco­hol behind? These guys were obvi­ously tro­phy drinkers, judg­ing from the plethora of empty liquor bot­tles adorn­ing their kitchen cab­i­nets. What could pos­si­bly have made them aban­don over 100 ounces of alco­hol? I can only hope that it was some fit­ting karmic ret­ri­bu­tion for their waste­ful natures.

Oxymoronica

Oxymoronica Oxy­moron­ica para­dox­i­cal wit and wis­dom from history’s great­est word­smithsMardy Grothe
Harper­Collins Pub­lish­ers 2004
World­CatLibrary­ThingGoogle BooksBook­Finder 

It is some­what fit­ting that I have mixed feel­ings about a book enti­tled Oxy­moron­ica. On one hand, it is a delight­ful col­lec­tion of quotes from authors, philoso­phers, sci­en­tists, enter­tain­ers, politi­cians, and mis­cel­la­neous oth­ers. On the other hand, the quotes given are not all oxy­moronic in nature. Many fall into the cat­e­gory of Irish Bulls, while oth­ers seem to have no con­tra­dic­tory or absurd con­struc­tions at all; they are merely pithy state­ments. This last cat­e­gory falls out­side even Grothe’s spu­ri­ous def­i­n­i­tion of “oxy­moron­ica:” quo­ta­tions that con­tain incom­pat­i­ble or incon­gru­ous elements.

On the other hand (What? Three hands? That’s incon­gru­ous with the fact that most peo­ple only have two hands; it must be oxy­moron­ica!), there’s the infu­ri­at­ing way in which Grothe writes down to the reader. In his com­men­tary, he often feels the need to spell out every­thing — like the fact that most humans pos­sess two hands. Bit in addi­tion to assum­ing igno­rance on the part of the reader, Grothe dis­plays his own igno­rance with state­ments like: “Well before Euro­peans set­tled in the New World, the Native Amer­i­cans had a say­ing…” Yes, the Native Amer­i­cans. All of them. Every indige­nous peo­ple, from the Inuit of the Arc­tic to the Mapuche of south­ern Chile share this one say­ing. And for that mat­ter, they all live in teepees and say “how.” Ass.

In another chap­ter, Grothe says: “Thanks to the abil­ity to ‘for­ward’ [extra­ne­ous quo­ta­tion marks] e-mails, mis­state­ments [not oxy­moron or even his own oxy­moron­ica] found in church bul­letins are quickly shared with friends and fam­ily — and then the rest of the world” (brack­eted com­ments are my own). He then turns around and says: “Here are a few gems I’ve dis­cov­ered in my research…” He con­sid­ers read­ing for­warded e-mails to be research; this explains a great deal.

My final com­plaint has to do with Dr. Mardy Grothe. What is he a doc­tor of? Psy­chol­ogy. If this was a book about psy­chol­ogy, fine — include the “Dr.” But for the most part, peo­ple with doc­tor­ates writ­ing in their own field of exper­tise don’t even employ the title. To do so in a piece of non-scholarly writ­ing out­side of one’s field is just pretentious.

Per­haps my feel­ings about this book are best described by a quote con­tained in it, attrib­uted to the British author G. K. Chester­ton: “You could com­pile the worst book in the world entirely out of selected pas­sages from the best writ­ers in the world.” Not the sense in which Chester­ton intended his state­ment, but it works for my purposes.

Pseudoscience

I’ve spent much of today watch­ing over an empty or nearly empty com­puter lab. It’s between sum­mer school ses­sions, so there are hardly any FSU stu­dents around. The hordes of high school­ers here for sum­mer music camp is a dif­fer­ent story — but, they don’t get to use the lab.

As I’ve been sit­ting here, dur­ing my own shift and while cov­er­ing those of two of my cowork­ers, I’ve done a vari­ety of things to amuse myself: play­ing Text Twist, surf­ing the web, talk­ing to Jen­nie, and read­ing. My cur­rent book, as some of you have prob­a­bly noticed in my side­bar, is enti­tled “Colum­bus Was Last: From 200,000 B.C. to 1492, A Hereti­cal His­tory of Who Was First,” by Patrick Huyghe.

Warn­ing: from this point on, I’m going to get nerdy.

Huyghe starts out with the true dis­cov­er­ers of Amer­ica: the peo­ples we now refer to as Native Amer­i­cans. Funny how that works, huh? The book talks all about Beringia, the once extant land bridge between Siberia and Alaska that has long been assumed to be the point of entry for early humans trav­el­ing from Asia. It also exam­ines evi­dence of entry by coastal sea travel. Huyghe then goes on to dis­cuss archae­o­log­i­cal evi­dence that chal­lenges the old arrival date (ca. 11,500 years BP) of humans on this con­ti­nent.
This is where he started to lose me. Some of the evi­dence he presents is fairly com­pelling (but still con­tro­ver­sial), such as exca­va­tions at Monte Verde in Chile and the Mead­ow­croft rock­shel­ter in Penn­syl­va­nia. These sites seem to push human arrival back a few thou­sand years from the pre­vi­ously accepted date. As I was read­ing about these, I started doing rudi­men­tary online fact-checking. From what I was able to find (admit­tedly, not in any­thing so reli­able as peer-reviewed jour­nals), Huyghe is pretty much right on the mark. He tends, how­ever, to empha­size the more fan­tas­tic and con­tro­ver­sial dates and evi­dence — some­thing I bet the archae­ol­o­gists them­selves would hes­i­tate to do. But then, he starts talk­ing about Cal­ico Lake, a site in the Mojave Desert in Cal­i­for­nia. This site has been (he admits, not com­pletely reli­ably) dated to 200,000–300,000 years BP. How­ever, the only arti­facts the site has pro­duced are pieces of rock that some argue are prim­i­tive stone tools, and oth­ers argue are just pieces of rock. It’s very obvi­ous, how­ever, that Mr. Huyghe wants to believe.

The next chap­ter dis­cusses sim­i­lar­i­ties between pot­tery in Ecuador and Japan approx­i­mately 5,000 years BP. Huyghe makes good argu­ments of mor­pho­log­i­cal sim­i­lar­i­ties and the fea­si­bil­ity (based on weather and cur­rents) of a sea jour­ney from Japan to Ecuador with the Japan­ese mar­itime tech­nol­ogy of the period. But again, he grav­i­tates towards the more fan­tas­tic expla­na­tions with­out offer­ing much in the way of alter­nate the­o­ries. The next topic is sup­posed Chi­nese explo­ration — delib­er­ate, methodic explo­ration — of North Amer­ica about 4000 years BP. The evi­dence here seems quite weak and cir­cum­stan­tial. The inter­pre­tive stretches remind me very much of Gavin Menzies’s book 1421: The Year China Dis­cov­ered Amer­ica, which makes sim­i­larly dubi­ous claims for a more recent Chi­nese land­ing in America.

It’s at this point in my inter­net fact-checking that I decide to get some facts on Mr. Huyghe. His bio on the book jacket is suit­ably vague, call­ing him only a “free­lance sci­ence writer” and list­ing some of the pub­li­ca­tions for which he has writ­ten — no list of other pub­li­ca­tions. So, I went to Ama­zon. Now I under­stand why he seems so dearly to want to believe even the least well-supported the­o­ries. I present to you rep­re­sen­ta­tive selec­tions from the oeu­vre of Patrick Huyghe, cour­tesy of Amazon:

•The Field Guide to Lake Mon­sters, Sea Ser­pents, and Other Mys­tery Denizens of the Deep
•The Field Guide To UFOs: A Clas­si­fi­ca­tion Of Var­i­ous Uniden­ti­fied Aer­ial Phe­nom­ena Based On Eye­wit­ness Accounts
•The Field Guide to Big­foot, Yeti and Other Mys­tery Pri­mates World­wide
•The Field Guide to Ghost and Other Appari­tions
•Swamp Gas Times: My Two Decades on the UFO Beat

That’s it. His cred­i­bil­ity is gone. In my mind, he is now irrev­o­ca­bly assigned to the ranks of Erich von Daniken and Gra­ham Han­cock. These are the guys you see on the Dis­cov­ery Chan­nel espous­ing the notion that early civ­i­liza­tions (ie: ancient Egypt and var­i­ous Mesoamer­i­can cul­tures) couldn’t pos­si­bly have built their great tem­ples and mon­u­ments with­out help from aliens or Atlanteans (who came from Mars, any­way). Every time I’m brows­ing the his­tory sec­tion of a book­store and I see one of their books, I’m over­come by a cold rage and the desire to cre­ate a sep­a­rate “Crack­pot” shelf for their benefit.

So, I’m going to fin­ish the book, even if I scoff the whole way through it. I’ve never delib­er­ately failed to fin­ish a book. Besides, he can’t butcher Leif Eric­s­son and the Viking voy­ages to New­found­land, can he? Can he?

Special Delivery

And now, I bring you the sec­ond install­ment in my series on stu­pid things found in my TA mail­box (See the first post here). This time, the offend­ing item is a post­card adver­tis­ing the Sym­phony Con­do­mini­ums. These con­dos are slated to be built across the street from the music build­ing, in a a space cur­rently occu­pied by an active soror­ity house and a derelict frat house. Now, we in the Col­lege of Music have been hear­ing buzz about this for awhile.

<gos­sip and hearsay>
Appar­ently, FSU wanted to pur­chase and use the land. I’ve heard a few dif­fer­ent sto­ries regard­ing the intended use, vary­ing from a park­ing lot to a new per­for­mance venue. In any case, the owner of the land refused to sell. Accord­ing to some sources, the owner has a grudge against FSU, and wants to erect a tall build­ing basi­cally amongst other FSU build­ings so that the school will lit­er­ally be in his shadow.
</gossip and hearsay>

The very fact that post­cards adver­tis­ing the Sym­phony Con­do­mini­ums were mailed to all the TAs (and prob­a­bly the fac­ulty) of the Col­lege of Music seems to sup­port the grudge story. The soror­ity and fra­ter­nity houses still stand on the site, so con­struc­tion can’t be immi­nent. Also, grad­u­ate stu­dents can’t be the tar­get mar­ket for $250K con­dos (the start­ing price given on the post­cards them­selves), unless the devel­op­ers are just plain stupid.

In any case, appar­ently some polit­i­cal strings were pulled to get the land rezoned for mixed use (a multi-story condo build­ing with retail space on the bot­tom floor). Let’s see… in how many ways is this a bad idea? Let’s start with the fact that the site is basi­cally on cam­pus, with class build­ings on two sides and soror­ity and fra­ter­nity houses on another. The streets that would pro­vide access to the Sym­phony are nar­row two-lane roads that are gen­er­ally con­gested for a good por­tion of every school day. Traf­fic only gets worse at night when there are con­certs, espe­cially for per­for­mances at the 3000-seat Ruby Dia­mond Audi­to­rium, which is less than a block from the site. Park­ing around cam­pus is extremely lim­ited, and any new lots (ie. for Sym­phony res­i­dents) would undoubt­edly get unin­vited guests both day and night.

Now, let’s talk about the post­card. The devel­op­ers are mak­ing a big deal about their property’s prox­im­ity to the School (sic) of Music. The fact is men­tioned in bold face on the front of the card, and among the ameni­ties listed on the reverse is “Open­ing Nights at Florida State University’s Renowned School of Music.” So, they’re using us as adver­tis­ing. Great. My favorite part of the entire card is the admo­ni­tion, “Don’t Miss the Grand Finale to Har­mo­nious Liv­ing. Lim­ited Units Avail­able.” The “Grand Finale?” Are these con­dos, or is the build­ing an upscale hospice?

The card points inter­ested par­ties to symphonycondominiums.com. This is where it gets really good. Regard­less of your answer to the ques­tion of your con­nec­tion speed, you will be bom­barded with a loud lo-fi record­ing of a vio­lin con­certo. If you are unfor­tu­nate enough to choose the broad­band option, you will be sub­jected to a slow load­ing process before your ears are blasted off. But, when the music does come, you’ll also get a dumb flash ani­ma­tion with com­posers’ names and bits of printed music float­ing behind adver­tis­ing jar­gon. Here’s one gem: “We invite you to orches­trate your own rhythm and set your own tone for har­mo­nious liv­ing at the Sym­phony Con­do­mini­ums.” Thank God for the ‘Skip Intro’ button.

The con­dos’ prox­im­ity to the (again incor­rectly labeled) School of Music is fea­tured promi­nently on both the ‘Build­ing’ and ‘Fea­tures’ pages. The best part of the site, how­ever, is to be found on the ‘Mod­els’ page. Here we see 8 dif­fer­ent floor plans that will be avail­able, each named after a com­poser. The units are: Beethoven, Bucelli, Chopin, Haydn, Mozart, Rach­mani­nov, Straus, and Tchaikovsky. Wait a sec­ond… Straus? With only one ‘s’ at the end? Well, that’s not either Johann or Richard; they’ve each got a full com­ple­ment of ‘s’s. Per­haps the devel­op­ers have a soft spot for Christoph Straus, the renais­sance com­poser, or per­haps Oscar Straus, an early 20th-century opera com­poser. They’re both so pop­u­lar that I had to do a search for ‘Straus’ just to see if any com­posers by that name existed. And what about Bucelli? He must be one of those obscure Ital­ian Baroque com­posers, right? Hmm, a search of The New Grove Dic­tio­nary of Music and Musi­cians reveals no one named ‘Bucelli.’ The best expla­na­tion I can come up with is that they were going for Andrea Bocelli, the blind tenor. Con­tem­po­rary opera singers, mas­ter com­posers, they’re all the same, right?

Unfor­tu­nately, I’ll prob­a­bly be long gone by the time the Sym­phony Con­do­mini­ums open, if they ever do. It’s a shame that I won’t get the chance to make fun of them in person.

New and… improved?

Ear­lier this semes­ter, the FSU School of Music became the FSU Col­lege of Music. Word of this has slowly trick­led down to us stu­dents, since we’re appar­ently not impor­tant enough to even receive an e-mail mes­sage regard­ing the change. Also, many things — includ­ing the web­site — still say “School of Music.” This week marks one of the first times I’ve seen “Col­lege of Music” on any­thing semi-permanent or offi­cial. Unfor­tu­nately, the object on which this appears is not an ele­gant new sign out­side the build­ing, nor is it a stack of styl­ish new let­ter­head. No. Our new des­ig­na­tion is embla­zoned across an ugly-ass pen.
Here’s a descrip­tion of this vari­ety of pen from a com­pany that sells pro­mo­tional materials:

Bic Clic Stic Foil Pens fea­ture a radi­ant, scin­til­lat­ing pris­matic look. They’re opales­cent and kalei­do­scopic… they glit­ter, sparkle, daz­zle, and that’s what gives them such dynamic pro­mo­tional impact!

Here’s my own description:

Bic Clic Stick Foil Pens fea­ture a cheap, gaudy, cheesy look. They’re chintzy and gar­ish… they are ugly, tacky, and taste­less, and that’s what gives them such counter-promotional impact!

As if the pens them­selves weren’t ugly enough, some­one has made a very poor deci­sion with regards to the let­ter­ing. “Florida State Uni­ver­sity Col­lege of Music” is in one font, and “www.music.fsu.edu” is in another font. Not only are the two type­faces totally unre­lated to one another, but one is a serif font while the other is sans-serif.

This is not the sort of thing that should be used to adver­tise one of the largest col­le­giate music pro­grams in the coun­try. This is the sort of thing you’d expect to get from a sleazy used car sales­man. “Car-aaazy Eddie’s Pre-Owned Plea­sure­mo­biles” would be much more at home on this pro­mo­tional trav­esty. What’s next? Will the web­site be redesigned with tiled back­ground images and a bad midi file play­ing on repeat? Will they just put a “Col­lege” sticker over “School” on the sign out­side the build­ing (in a dif­fer­ent font, of course)? I truly hope that this awful pen is not a sign of things to come from the newly chris­tened Col­lege of Music.